While reading the remainder of the book, there were
different topics that squared my thoughts about the common core, pointed me in
new directions, and things that are still circling my mind…
Squared my thinking:
My feelings about the importance of writing workshop were
confirmed in chapter seven when I read about how essential it is to give
students the opportunity to write often .
In the book it states “Having crystal clear goals will not make a whit
of difference if students don’t have protected time in school to work on
achieving those goals and if teachers don’t have time to convey feedback and
coach their writers in the act of writing” (125). This quote highlights the
importance of writer’s workshop and how important it is to give students the
space to write and provide them with feedback and the opportunity to revise. I
love the analogy the author gives about comparing this process to observing
music teachers and chorus directors and how they give their students attentive
feedback and the opportunity for students to try again. Having implemented some
writer’s workshop strategies this year has given my students the opportunity to
develop their writing skills.
I love the strategies that are provided in chapter eight
when it discusses ways to build up skills in argumentative writing. “The
teacher first teaches students to write argument essays around subjects that
are especially accessible to the writers. Then, once the writers have mastered
the writing type, guide them in applying their skills to more remote subject
matter” (138). This squared my thinking because in many of our courses we have
talked about the importance of connecting student interest to reading and writing to develop their skills. When students have the opportunity to
write or read about what they are
interested in, they learn to appreciate and sometimes grow to love reading and
writing. It then becomes easier to transfer that skill to a specific subject.
This year, my students have the opportunity to read and write about topics that
interests them.
Another topic that the
book discusses that I have often though about is some schools response to the common core. “Our
first suggestion to school leaders, then, is to guard against responding to the
Common Core with a knee-jerk reaction to add new programs, each of which bears
the label of Common Core” (183). I often feel that my school adopts so many
programs that are said to help students master the common core standards, that it becomes an overwhelming task to implement
all of these programs. I don’t disregard these programs as unimportant, but I
feel that a school should only adopt one or two programs and utilize them for a
period of time to allow students and teachers to learn and develop in using the
program for them to be really effective.
Pointed in new
direction
I was really inspired by the examples of students’ capability
of producing details, building tension and creating other emotions through
their writing. The examples in chapters seven (p. 114, Glowing Shoes writing sample and the kindergarten writing sample in
chapter six (p.108)), shows that our students are able to produce high levels
of writing. Even at the kindergarten level, students can develop fluent ideas
and details through words and pictures.
The ability to teach the art of conveying detail and emotion
is something that I want to do a better job of for the remainder of the year
and next year. I know that providing mentor text is a great way to help
students develop these skills.
Still thinking
about it…
In chapter eight, the book discusses the standards of
argument and opinion writing. Common core writing emphasizes the ability for
students to convey their opinion, refute counterarguments, and analyzing
sources. This is an area where some of my students struggle. I think this
standard of writing connects strongly to the environment of our schools. I
believe there might be a strong disconnect for students if they are in a school
environment that requires them to be silenced for the majority of the day and
are policed when to speak and to have opinions, but then are asked to state opinions
and convey arguments in their classrooms. I find that students have a hard time
developing and justifying their arguments and opinions in the writing, b/c the
majority of the time they are in school their opinions are not valued. I have
to say that I’m guilty of aiding in that environment b/c there is strong
pressure to have discipline over our class. However, I’m thinking of how I can
balance that discipline but still allow my students to feel that they still
have a voice, in and outside the context of their writing. I think chapter eleven
speaks to this very by stating “…any reform effort must be deeply connected to
the learning culture of the school, the collaboration of its teachers and
school leaders and also assessment” (p. 181). Although this chapter focuses on
aligned assessment and its connection to school reform, when I think of learning culture, I also think of the
way we interact and treat our students in and outside of the classroom.
In chapter six, the authors discuss the role media plays in
the writing standards for the common core. “Fourth graders are expected to produce
a minimum of one typed page in a sitting, and fifth graders, a minimum of two
typed pages in a sitting.” (p.106). There are many instances in the common core
in which students are called to integrate technology. However, with the lack of
technology resources in some schools and homes of the students we serve, I
wonder how some of these standards can be achieved. At my school for example,
we are limited to roughly 40 technology resources (that includes computers,
laptops, and ipads) for about 300-400 students, which presents a challenge. I
first think the ability to provide technology resources to our schools need to
be improved and including technology based classes such as keyboarding,
programming, and coding need to be a part of the daily curriculum. I don’t
think the responsibility of developing technology skills in students should
solely fall on the general education teacher, but someone who specializes in
technology should be teaching our students how to develop their skills in
technology. It should be a general subject included with: reading, ELA, science,
social studies and math.
Reading Pathways to the Common Core has shaped my attitude
and approach to the common core standards. Reading this text has helped me to
understand the common core better and have more respect for the standards. It
has been a great reference for me to help me unpack and better understand the
standards. My only wish is that I had read this book sooner.